In a stunning twist of fate, the United States is slashing its own strategic arsenal—not with bombs or bullets, but with budget cuts driven by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). From the gutting of Radio Free Asia to the dismantling of critical cybersecurity defenses, America’s retreat is leaving a gaping void that China is racing to fill. As Musk’s unprecedented Pentagon talks stir controversy and his business ties to Beijing raise eyebrows, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Are these moves a masterstroke of efficiency or a reckless unraveling of U.S. global dominance? Explore how these seismic shifts are reshaping national security, soft power, and the world order in ways that could haunt us for decades.

If you enjoy this newsletter, please consider sharing it with your friends and business contacts. Click the button below:

Paying the bills

Learn AI in 5 minutes a day

This is the easiest way for a busy person wanting to learn AI in as little time as possible:

1. Sign up for The Rundown AI newsletter

2. They send you 5-minute email updates on the latest AI news and how to use it

3. You learn how to become 2x more productive by leveraging AI

Sign up to start learning.

Links We Like

Strategic Unraveling: The United States' Cuts and China's Opportunity

The United States' recent strategic cuts, led by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), have raised significant concerns regarding national security, soft power, and geopolitical influence. As key agencies and institutions are dismantled or defunded, a vacuum is emerging that China appears poised to fill. Meanwhile, Musk's unprecedented Pentagon talks and his influence over government spending further complicate an already volatile situation. The implications of these shifts are profound, touching upon cybersecurity, military readiness, information warfare, and diplomatic influence.

A Systematic Retreat from Soft Power

One of the most glaring casualties of the cost-cutting measures is Radio Free Asia (RFA), a critical institution for countering Chinese propaganda and providing independent news to millions across the region. The decision to furlough most of RFA’s staff and strip its funding is particularly perplexing, given its role in exposing human rights abuses and countering misinformation from Beijing.

The closure of RFA aligns with broader cutbacks at U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), which also oversees Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and other international broadcasting services. These platforms have historically been key tools in promoting democratic values and countering authoritarian narratives. With their reduction, China is left with an unchallenged voice in shaping public opinion across Asia and beyond.

Simultaneously, the elimination of the Office of Net Assessment at the Pentagon raises concerns about long-term strategic planning. This think tank, historically responsible for predicting emerging threats and shaping U.S. defense strategy, was instrumental in Cold War-era military innovations. Its abrupt dissolution removes a critical foresight mechanism in an era of rapid technological advancements, particularly in artificial intelligence and autonomous warfare.

Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities and Strategic Gaps

The dismantling of key cyber defense initiatives, including the Cyber Safety Review Board, represents another alarming shift. This board was tasked with analyzing and responding to major cybersecurity incidents, such as Chinese state-sponsored hacks targeting U.S. telecommunications and intelligence networks. Its disappearance leaves critical questions unanswered: Who will now spearhead cybersecurity reviews? How will America respond to future digital intrusions?

China has consistently demonstrated its ability to infiltrate U.S. networks, including classified defense and intelligence operations. Without a dedicated agency to investigate breaches and recommend safeguards, America’s digital infrastructure is left increasingly vulnerable. Beijing, in contrast, continues to invest heavily in its cyber warfare capabilities, with state-backed hackers frequently targeting both government and private sector entities in the U.S.

Military and Strategic Implications

While the Trump administration has emphasized conventional military power, including the announcement of the F-47 stealth fighter jet, critics argue that prioritizing hardware over strategic intelligence is shortsighted. Soft power initiatives and intelligence-driven operations often yield greater long-term influence than brute military strength. The paradox is that while the administration justifies spending cuts as necessary for efficiency, it continues to push for costly new weapons systems without considering the broader context of modern warfare.

The dissolution of strategic planning entities and reduction in cybersecurity defenses create an imbalance. China’s growing military capabilities, particularly in naval and missile development, demand not just a show of force but also a nuanced strategic response. The defunding of key institutions suggests a shift toward a more reactionary approach rather than a proactive, long-term strategy.

Musk’s Pentagon Meeting: Influence and Controversy

Adding another layer to this evolving landscape is Elon Musk’s unprecedented meeting at the Pentagon. As a major contractor through SpaceX and Starlink, Musk wields significant influence over U.S. defense priorities. His call for prosecuting leakers who allegedly disclosed his discussions with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth further underscores the blurred lines between private industry and government decision-making.

Musk's businesses stand to benefit from the administration’s strategic shifts. The planned Golden Dome missile defense shield, which would require an extensive satellite network, aligns closely with SpaceX’s Starlink technology. While innovation in defense is essential, the close intertwining of private enterprise with national security raises concerns about transparency and accountability. Furthermore, Musk’s business ties to China add another layer of complexity. With Tesla deeply embedded in the Chinese market, questions arise about potential conflicts of interest.

The Global Perception and China’s Response

Internationally, these cuts and policy shifts are being closely monitored. Chinese state media has been quick to highlight America’s internal dismantling of its own influence apparatus. The Global Times, a mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist Party, has celebrated the downfall of U.S. government-backed media outlets, portraying it as a sign of America’s retreat from global leadership.

China is not just filling the void in terms of media influence but also expanding its geopolitical reach. From the Belt and Road Initiative to increased investments in emerging technologies, Beijing is actively positioning itself as the dominant global power. While the U.S. scales back, China advances, capitalizing on America's self-imposed limitations.

Conclusion: The Cost of Strategic Withdrawal

"Vacuum of Influence: The Unintended Consequences of U.S. Retrenchment"

The strategic choices made under the banner of government efficiency carry long-term consequences. The defunding of critical institutions that contribute to national security and global influence creates a vacuum that adversaries like China are eager to exploit. The emphasis on hardware over strategic foresight, combined with cybersecurity vulnerabilities and the erosion of soft power, risks undermining America's global standing.

While fiscal responsibility is an essential component of governance, the indiscriminate dismantling of key assets without a coherent replacement strategy is not efficiency—it is a dangerous gamble. The United States has long maintained its influence through a combination of military strength, economic power, and strategic diplomacy. Weakening these pillars leaves the nation vulnerable, not just to external threats but also to a shifting global order where China is increasingly setting the rules of engagement.

If the goal is to compete effectively with China, then America must recognize that influence is about more than just firepower. It is about information, diplomacy, and strategic planning—areas where recent decisions have left significant gaps. As global dynamics continue to evolve, the question remains: will the U.S. course correct before the cost of retreat becomes irreversible?

If you enjoy this newsletter, please consider sharing it with your friends and business contacts by clicking the button below. ⬇️ 

Thank you for reading this far. Please share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comment section below.

About The Modern Warfare

We strive to provide insightful and unbiased reporting on the most pressing issues of our time. Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed and ahead of the curve.

Stay informed. Stay vigilant. Stay ahead.

The Modern Warfare Team

Disclaimer: This newsletter is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial or political advice.

That’s it for this episode!

Thank you so much for reading today’s email! Your support is the only way I can write this email for free daily.

Kindly give us feedback in the poll below and share the newsletter with other investors if you find it valuable!