In an unexpected move that has sent shockwaves across the global technology and defense sectors, China has imposed a ban on the export of gallium and germanium to the United States. These minerals, pivotal to the creation of everything from smartphones to military equipment, are predominantly controlled by China, holding 98% of the world's gallium and 91% of germanium supply. This decision not only represents a significant escalation in Sino-U.S. economic tensions but also forces a reevaluation of supply chain dependencies. As we stand at the brink of a supply chain crisis, this newsletter delves into the immediate impacts, strategic responses, and long-term solutions to navigate through this new era of technological and security challenges.

If you enjoy this newsletter, please consider sharing it with your friends and business contacts. Click the button below:

Paying the bills

Our newsletter is powered by beehiiv, which partners with trustworthy and high-quality advertisers.

Start learning AI in 2025

Everyone talks about AI, but no one has the time to learn it. So, we found the easiest way to learn AI in as little time as possible: The Rundown AI.

It's a free AI newsletter that keeps you up-to-date on the latest AI news, and teaches you how to apply it in just 5 minutes a day.

Plus, complete the quiz after signing up and they’ll recommend the best AI tools, guides, and courses – tailored to your needs.

Sign up to start learning.

Today’s partners

Links We Like

China’s Mineral Export Ban: Navigating a Supply Chain Crisis in Technology and Security

The global technology and defense industries have been shaken by China's recent decision to ban the export of gallium and germanium to the United States. These critical minerals, indispensable to the production of advanced computer chips, military technology, and renewable energy systems, are the lifeblood of many high-tech sectors. As China controls the overwhelming majority of the global supply—98% of gallium and 91% of germanium—the decision has placed the United States and other nations reliant on these minerals in a precarious position.

This development is not an isolated move. It reflects an intensifying economic and strategic rivalry between the two nations, fueled by U.S. restrictions on advanced semiconductor exports to China. The stakes are high, and the scramble for alternatives has commenced.

Understanding the Critical Role of Gallium and Germanium

Gallium and germanium are trace minerals, meaning they occur in very low concentrations as byproducts of refining other major minerals like zinc, coal, and bauxite. Despite their relatively obscure origins, these minerals play a pivotal role in various industries.

Applications Across Industries

• Technology: Gallium is essential for manufacturing LEDs, smartphones, and advanced computer chips, while germanium is critical for optical fibers, solar cells, and catalysts used in producing plastics.

• Military: Both minerals are integral to the production of advanced military technologies such as night vision goggles, hypersonic missiles, and electronic warfare systems.

• Renewable Energy: The materials support green energy advancements, including components for electric vehicles and solar panels.

The dual-use nature of these minerals—serving both civilian and military purposes—has only heightened their strategic importance. The potential for disruptions in their supply chain underscores vulnerabilities in industries dependent on advanced technology.

The Impact of China’s Export Ban

China's ban on gallium and germanium exports is a direct response to U.S. efforts to limit China's access to advanced semiconductor technology, citing national security concerns. While the U.S. Department of Defense holds a strategic reserve of germanium, it lacks reserves of gallium, leaving it particularly exposed. This action could cost the U.S. economy an estimated $3.4 billion, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

The ripple effects of the ban extend beyond the United States. European nations and allied countries, which also rely heavily on Chinese supplies of these minerals, face similar challenges. With limited immediate alternatives, the ban threatens to disrupt global supply chains, delaying production and innovation in several critical sectors.

Exploring U.S. Strategies to Mitigate the Crisis

The U.S. is exploring several strategies to address its dependence on China for these minerals. Each comes with distinct challenges and opportunities.

1. Restarting Domestic Mining and Production

Historically, the U.S. produced germanium at the Apex mine in Utah, but the site closed in the 1980s. Reviving operations at sites like this could provide a partial solution. Similarly, identifying domestic deposits of gallium in zinc and bauxite refineries might offer an untapped resource. However, these efforts require significant investment and years to yield results, making them a long-term strategy.

2. Partnering with Allied Nations

Diversifying the supply chain by sourcing gallium and germanium from allies is another avenue. For example, Canada’s Teck Resources extracts germanium at its Trail smelter in British Columbia. Collaborative investments in refining and production facilities in friendly nations could help reduce dependence on China while strengthening economic ties with allies.

3. Enhancing Recycling Efforts

Recycling old electronic devices and hardware is an attractive secondary source of these minerals. However, the process of isolating gallium and germanium from complex electronic components remains technologically challenging and cost-intensive. Presently, recycled materials contribute only a small fraction to the global supply—less than 10% for gallium and around 30% for germanium.

4. Advancing Recovery Technologies

Investment in research to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of recycling processes is critical. Technological advancements could significantly increase the recovery yield of these minerals, making secondary sources a viable alternative to raw material extraction. This approach, though promising, is unlikely to deliver immediate relief.

Barriers to Overcoming the Crisis

The challenges in addressing this supply chain crisis are multifaceted:

• High Costs: Both mining and recycling operations require substantial upfront investment, and the cost of producing gallium and germanium domestically is currently non-competitive with Chinese production.

• Technological Hurdles: Extracting trace minerals from complex products and refining them for industrial use remains an arduous and inefficient process.

• Time Constraints: Developing a robust domestic or allied production capacity for these minerals will take years, leaving a short-term gap in supply.

Geopolitical Implications

China’s ban highlights its leverage over the global supply chain for critical minerals and serves as a reminder of the interconnectedness of the world economy. For the U.S., this is a wake-up call to reevaluate its supply chain dependencies. It also underscores the importance of fostering alliances with nations that possess untapped mineral reserves or technological expertise in recycling.

From a broader perspective, the situation exposes the vulnerabilities inherent in a global economy dominated by a few suppliers of essential resources. Diversification and resilience in supply chains are not just economic necessities—they are matters of national security.

What Lies Ahead?

In the short term, China’s ban will likely disrupt industries reliant on gallium and germanium, delaying technological and military advancements. In the long term, the crisis may catalyze significant changes in how nations approach resource dependency.

For the U.S., this could mean greater investment in mining infrastructure, recycling technologies, and international partnerships. Additionally, the situation might spur innovation in the development of substitutes for gallium and germanium, though none currently exist that match their unique properties.

Conclusion: Building a Resilient Future in Mineral Supply Chains

China’s decision to restrict gallium and germanium exports has revealed the vulnerabilities in global supply chains for critical minerals. The impact of this ban extends far beyond immediate economic losses—it poses significant risks to national security and technological innovation. The United States and its allies must act decisively to reduce dependence on a single supplier by diversifying sources, revitalizing domestic production, and investing in recycling and recovery technologies.

While the road ahead is fraught with challenges, this crisis offers an opportunity to build more resilient and sustainable supply chains. By leveraging partnerships, advancing recovery methods, and fostering innovation, the U.S. and its allies can turn this disruption into a turning point, securing the materials necessary for the technologies of tomorrow.

If you enjoy this newsletter, please consider sharing it with your friends and business contacts by clicking the button below. ⬇️ 

Thank you for reading this far. Please share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comment section below.

About The Modern Warfare

We strive to provide insightful and unbiased reporting on the most pressing issues of our time. Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed and ahead of the curve.

Stay informed. Stay vigilant. Stay ahead.

The Modern Warfare Team

Disclaimer: This newsletter is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial or political advice.

That’s it for this episode!

Thank you so much for reading today’s email! Your support is the only way I can write this email for free daily.

Kindly give us feedback in the poll below and share the newsletter with other investors if you find it valuable!