In a world where power plays unfold not just on battlefields but in boardrooms, China’s subtle grip on global influence is tightening—and tech titan Elon Musk might just be its unlikely pawn. As geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China escalate, Beijing’s strategic use of economic leverage, from Tesla’s massive Chinese market to SpaceX’s security-sensitive tech, raises a provocative question: could Musk’s ties to Trump tip the scales of U.S. policy in China’s favor? This newsletter dives into the high-stakes clash of money, influence, and national security, revealing how the battle for America’s future is being fought in the shadows of corporate empires.

If you enjoy this newsletter, please consider sharing it with your friends and business contacts. Click the button below:

Paying the bills

Start learning AI in 2025

Everyone talks about AI, but no one has the time to learn it. So, we found the easiest way to learn AI in as little time as possible: The Rundown AI.

It's a free AI newsletter that keeps you up-to-date on the latest AI news, and teaches you how to apply it in just 5 minutes a day.

Plus, complete the quiz after signing up and they’ll recommend the best AI tools, guides, and courses – tailored to your needs.

Sign up to start learning.

Links We Like

The China Conundrum: Geopolitics, Business, and Influence in U.S. Policy

As geopolitical tensions between the United States and China continue to evolve, concerns over foreign influence, economic entanglements, and national security grow stronger. One of the latest controversies involves tech billionaire Elon Musk and his deep business ties with China. U.S. lawmakers have voiced concerns that Beijing may attempt to leverage Musk’s influence with former President Donald Trump to sway U.S. policy decisions. With the backdrop of heightened economic competition, security risks, and strategic maneuvering, this issue underscores the complexities of modern diplomacy, where business interests and national security are deeply intertwined.

Musk and China's Growing Leverage

China’s approach to foreign policy has long included leveraging key business figures to advance its strategic goals. Given Musk’s extensive operations in China—most notably Tesla’s significant market presence—Beijing may view him as a potential conduit to Trump. With Trump announcing new tariffs and restrictions on Chinese investments, China is actively looking for ways to mitigate U.S. economic pressures.

Tesla, which delivered nearly 37% of its vehicles to Chinese consumers last year, has become deeply reliant on China’s market. However, Tesla’s influence is waning as domestic Chinese EV manufacturers gain ground, and regulatory roadblocks have hindered Tesla’s self-driving technology rollout. This dependence presents a vulnerability that Chinese authorities could exploit to gain favor in Washington.

Beyond Tesla, Musk’s other ventures, such as SpaceX and X (formerly Twitter), are viewed by Beijing as security risks. SpaceX’s Starlink satellites have played a critical role in military operations in Ukraine, and its potential use in Taiwan raises alarms in China. Simultaneously, X’s ban in China limits its direct influence but increases Musk’s strategic value as an intermediary between Beijing and Washington.

The Political and Security Implications

The bipartisan concerns expressed by the U.S. House of Representatives' select committee on China suggest that Beijing could attempt to bypass hardline national security officials in Trump’s circle. Figures like Secretary of State Marco Rubio and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz have maintained a tough stance against China, making Musk an appealing alternative interlocutor.

Trump’s praise for Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin further complicates the geopolitical landscape. Lawmakers worry that Trump might pursue a grand bargain with Beijing that compromises core U.S. interests, including support for Taiwan and freedom of navigation in the South China Sea. Historically, Taiwan has relied on U.S. support as a counterbalance against Chinese aggression. A potential shift in policy favoring Beijing could destabilize the region and embolden China’s territorial ambitions.

Musk’s role as an adviser in Trump’s push to downsize the federal government raises further concerns. While the White House insists he has no decision-making authority, his proximity to Trump ensures that his views carry weight. If China successfully aligns its interests with Musk’s business goals, U.S. policy could be indirectly influenced in ways that benefit Beijing.

Economic and Strategic Countermeasures

As the U.S. navigates these challenges, several strategic countermeasures must be considered:

1. Strengthening Oversight of Business Influence in Politics: Given the precedent of foreign entities leveraging business leaders for political gain, Congress may push for increased transparency regarding corporate engagements with foreign governments. This could involve new regulations on foreign investments, mandatory disclosures, and restrictions on sensitive industries.

2. Diversifying Economic Interests: Tesla’s reliance on China’s market exposes vulnerabilities that could be mitigated through diversification. Encouraging U.S. tech and automotive firms to expand in alternative markets, such as India and Southeast Asia, could reduce Beijing’s leverage over American business leaders.

3. Strengthening Alliances: The U.S. must continue reinforcing its relationships with allies in Asia and Europe to counterbalance China’s growing influence. Japan, South Korea, and India remain critical partners in the Indo-Pacific strategy, and maintaining a strong NATO presence ensures continued European support.

4. Technology and Security Protections: Given Musk’s involvement in sectors with national security implications, such as space technology and artificial intelligence, tighter restrictions on the flow of intellectual property and security-sensitive innovations must be considered.

China’s Broader Influence Tactics

This situation is not an isolated case but part of a broader pattern of China’s influence strategies. Through economic enticements, strategic partnerships, and political maneuvering, China has successfully integrated itself into key industries worldwide. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) exemplifies how China uses infrastructure investments to build economic dependencies in Asia, Africa, and Europe. Similarly, its control over critical supply chains—such as rare earth minerals essential for electronics—gives Beijing significant economic leverage.

Countries that have heavily relied on Chinese investments, such as Sri Lanka and Zambia, have faced debt challenges, reinforcing fears of economic entrapment. The U.S. has attempted to counter this with initiatives like the Build Back Better World (B3W) and the Global Gateway Initiative in Europe. However, these programs still struggle to match the scale of China’s financial reach.

The debate over Musk’s potential role in shaping U.S.-China relations is merely a microcosm of this larger geopolitical contest. It highlights the blurred lines between corporate interests and national security, revealing the vulnerabilities that arise when economic dependencies intertwine with political strategy.

Conclusion: The Future of U.S.-China Relations in the Business Sphere

As the geopolitical rivalry between the U.S. and China intensifies, the role of influential business leaders in shaping foreign policy cannot be ignored. The concerns surrounding Musk serve as a cautionary tale of how economic entanglements can be weaponized in diplomacy. Moving forward, the U.S. must take decisive steps to safeguard its political decision-making from external influence, ensuring that national security interests remain uncompromised.

While China continues to expand its global influence through economic means, the U.S. must remain vigilant, proactive, and strategic in countering these efforts. By reinforcing alliances, protecting technological advancements, and maintaining transparency in corporate dealings, Washington can uphold its commitment to global stability while safeguarding its sovereignty. The battle for influence is no longer fought solely through military might or diplomacy—it is increasingly waged in boardrooms and markets, where economic dependencies shape the future of international relations.

If you enjoy this newsletter, please consider sharing it with your friends and business contacts by clicking the button below. ⬇️ 

Thank you for reading this far. Please share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comment section below.

About The Modern Warfare

We strive to provide insightful and unbiased reporting on the most pressing issues of our time. Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed and ahead of the curve.

Stay informed. Stay vigilant. Stay ahead.

The Modern Warfare Team

Disclaimer: This newsletter is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial or political advice.

That’s it for this episode!

Thank you so much for reading today’s email! Your support is the only way I can write this email for free daily.

Kindly give us feedback in the poll below and share the newsletter with other investors if you find it valuable!