Elon Musk & Donald Jr. On MSNBC - A Dangerous Path Ahead?

The Implications of Billionaires Buying Into News Networks

In partnership with

Recent exchanges between Elon Musk and Donald Trump Jr. regarding the potential purchase of MSNBC have sparked concern about media ownership. This scenario raises significant questions about journalism and free speech. What would it mean for a major liberal news network to be controlled by a tech mogul known for reshaping platforms to fit his vision?

This newsletter explores the potential consequences of such a merger and the broader trend of media consolidation by wealthy individuals, highlighting important implications for democracy and media independence.

If you enjoy this newsletter, please consider sharing it with your friends and business contacts. Click the button below:

Paying the bills

Our newsletter is powered by beehiiv, which partners with trustworthy and high-quality advertisers.

Start learning AI in 2025

Everyone talks about AI, but no one has the time to learn it. So, we found the easiest way to learn AI in as little time as possible: The Rundown AI.

It's a free AI newsletter that keeps you up-to-date on the latest AI news, and teaches you how to apply it in just 5 minutes a day.

Plus, complete the quiz after signing up and they’ll recommend the best AI tools, guides, and courses – tailored to your needs.

Today’s partners

Links We Like

In recent weeks, the world’s richest man, Elon Musk, and Donald Trump Jr. have caused quite a stir on social media with their musings about the future of MSNBC. What started as a playful back-and-forth on X (formerly Twitter) has sparked widespread discussions about the potential ramifications of such an acquisition, particularly in the context of media ownership, politics, and the broader landscape of free speech.

Musk and Trump Jr.'s Social Media Tease

The conversation began with Donald Trump Jr. sending a playful message to Musk on X, suggesting the idea of buying MSNBC. The network, owned by Comcast, is known for its left-leaning political coverage and prominent personalities such as Rachel Maddow. "Hey @elonmusk I have the funniest idea ever!!!" Trump Jr. wrote, followed by Musk’s typically sardonic reply: “How much does it cost?” Musk added further fuel to the fire with another comment, “The most entertaining outcome, especially if ironic, is most likely,” punctuated with a laughing emoji.

While their comments were likely intended as jokes, the idea of Musk purchasing MSNBC has not gone unnoticed. Musk’s history of making impulsive business moves, such as his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter (now X), led many to wonder whether there might be more to this than just banter. Given Musk’s influence in both the tech and media sectors, such a move could have significant implications for the media landscape in the United States and beyond.

The Potential Impact of a Musk-Owned MSNBC

Musk’s apparent interest in purchasing MSNBC aligns with a broader trend in which wealthy individuals, particularly those with political ties, are consolidating control over major media outlets. For instance, Musk’s ownership of X has already shifted the dynamics of online discourse, particularly around politics. He has used his platform to reverse key policies, such as reinstating former President Donald Trump’s account, leading to concerns about the role of billionaires in controlling political narratives.

In a similar vein, Trump Jr.'s suggestion that Musk could acquire MSNBC underscores the increasing influence of wealthy individuals on the media landscape. By purchasing a major news outlet like MSNBC, Musk would be able to significantly shape public opinion, further consolidating his already extensive power in both the media and technology sectors.

Critics have raised alarms about this potential consolidation of media power, particularly in light of the controversial role that oligarchs and state-controlled media play in Russia. Thomas Whalen, a professor at Boston University, drew parallels between Musk's possible purchase of MSNBC and the way Russian oligarchs, with the backing of President Vladimir Putin, have acquired control over critical media outlets in Russia. Whalen suggested that such moves could be detrimental to media freedom in the United States, where a robust and independent press is seen as essential to holding power accountable.

The Context of Media Control in the U.S.

The notion of billionaires purchasing media outlets is not entirely new. Musk’s own acquisition of X, combined with Trump’s ongoing war with the media, signals an era of increasing polarization and potential corporate influence over news organizations. As seen in the past, Trump has had a contentious relationship with outlets like MSNBC, accusing them of election interference and fake news. Similarly, Musk has been vocal about his criticisms of mainstream media, particularly outlets like CNN and MSNBC, which he and his allies view as biased against conservative viewpoints.

This dynamic raises the question of whether media outlets like MSNBC can continue to function independently if such a takeover occurs. MSNBC has been one of the most prominent critics of former President Trump and has maintained a generally liberal stance on political issues. The network's coverage of Trump’s administration and its policies, including the investigations into his ties with Russia, has often been a target for Trump and his supporters. A potential acquisition by Musk or Trump could reshape the network’s editorial direction, raising concerns about journalistic integrity and the role of the press in a functioning democracy.

A Fragmented Media Landscape

Musk and Trump Jr.'s playful musings about a potential MSNBC takeover also come amid broader discussions about the fragmentation of the media landscape. With news organizations increasingly aligning themselves with political ideologies, consumers are finding it harder to find objective, unbiased news. As major media entities become more closely tied to political agendas, questions about the future of free and independent journalism loom large.

One of the main concerns raised by critics of media consolidation is the rise of "echo chambers," where news outlets cater to specific political ideologies and fail to provide a comprehensive view of current events. This has been particularly evident with the rise of partisan cable news networks such as Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC, each catering to specific segments of the political spectrum. A Musk-led MSNBC could further exacerbate this trend, polarizing public discourse even more.

Moreover, the rise of social media platforms like X has contributed to the breakdown of traditional news dissemination. Musk’s role in reshaping X, with its loosened content moderation policies, has led to the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories. If a media mogul like Musk were to own a major network like MSNBC, it could further blur the lines between social media, traditional journalism, and political propaganda, with the potential to erode trust in the media even further.

Refind - Brain food is delivered daily. Every day we analyze thousands of articles and send you only the best, tailored to your interests. Loved by 510,562 curious minds. Subscribe.

The Role of the Federal Government

The idea of Musk, or other wealthy individuals, buying a major media outlet has prompted calls for increased government oversight of media consolidation. In particular, some critics have suggested that lawmakers should take steps to protect press freedom and ensure that media outlets remain independent of corporate or political control.

Former President Trump has previously called for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to revoke the licenses of networks like MSNBC and CNN, which he believes are biased against him. While this is unlikely to happen under the current administration, the possibility of a government crackdown on media outlets controlled by political figures remains a real concern. The rise of government interference in media, combined with corporate consolidation, could lead to a situation where a few powerful entities control the flow of information in the United States, raising important questions about the future of democracy and free speech.

Conclusion: A Dangerous Path Ahead?

The possibility of Elon Musk or other billionaires taking control of major media outlets like MSNBC is a worrying development for the future of journalism in the United States. As media becomes more consolidated under the control of a few powerful individuals, the risks to press freedom and the integrity of public discourse grow.

As Thomas Whalen of Boston University warned, the potential takeover of MSNBC by Musk could mark a dangerous turning point for the media landscape. Just as Russian oligarchs have gained control of the media in their country, similar shifts in the United States could lead to the erosion of independent journalism. With media outlets potentially aligning with specific political agendas, the public could be left with a fragmented, biased, and less trustworthy media environment.

In the end, the future of media ownership in the United States will likely depend on how lawmakers, regulators, and the public respond to the growing influence of billionaires in the media world. If unchecked, the control of media by wealthy individuals could have profound implications for democracy, press freedom, and the free exchange of ideas. The question remains: can the media retain its independence, or will it be swayed by powerful interests with their own political and financial agendas?

If you enjoy this newsletter, please consider sharing it with your friends and business contacts by clicking the button below. ⬇️ 

Thank you for reading this far. Please share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comment section below.

About The Modern Warfare

We strive to provide insightful and unbiased reporting on the most pressing issues of our time. Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed and ahead of the curve.

Stay informed. Stay vigilant. Stay ahead.

The Modern Warfare Team

Disclaimer: This newsletter is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial or political advice.

That’s it for this episode!

Thank you so much for reading today’s email! Your support is the only way I can write this email for free daily.

Kindly give us feedback in the poll below and share the newsletter with other investors if you find it valuable!

How would you rate today's newsletter? If you vote 1 or 3 stars, please comment with what you didn't like so we can improve it.

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.