In a twist of corporate influence and policy-making, Elon Musk's role in government efficiency reforms could steer the course of rural broadband development in the U.S. towards favoring satellite internet over traditional fiber optics. Here's how this intersection of business interests and public policy might reshape connectivity for millions in rural America.

If you enjoy this newsletter, please consider sharing it with your friends and business contacts. Click the button below:

Paying the bills

Our newsletter is powered by beehiiv, which partners with trustworthy and high-quality advertisers.

Today’s partners

Links We Like

In recent years, Elon Musk has emerged as a vocal critic of government spending, particularly when it comes to the federal government’s initiatives to expand broadband access in rural areas. As the founder of Starlink, a satellite internet service under the umbrella of SpaceX, Musk stands to directly benefit if the U.S. government reduces or re-allocates funds from fiber optic broadband initiatives to satellite internet. This issue has raised concerns about the potential for conflicts of interest, given Musk’s unique position within the federal government and his business interests.

Musk was appointed by Donald Trump to co-lead a commission aimed at streamlining and reducing the size of the federal government. One of the commission’s primary goals is to enhance efficiency and cut costs, and Musk’s influence within this body could have significant ramifications for rural broadband development in the U.S. Specifically, the commission might suggest reallocating funding from the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program, a $42.45 billion initiative designed to provide high-speed internet to underserved and rural communities.

However, Starlink has not been a beneficiary of this funding, as government agencies deemed its satellite internet service too slow to meet the required standards. With Musk's involvement in government efficiency reform, there is speculation that his influence could help shift priorities to benefit satellite internet providers like Starlink, undermining the effectiveness of the BEAD Program.

The BEAD Program, launched as part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill, is an effort to expand broadband access to the approximately 19 million Americans who still lack reliable internet. A significant portion of the program’s funding is aimed at rolling out fiber optic broadband infrastructure in rural communities, where traditional broadband providers find it too expensive to lay fiber optic cables to serve small, sparsely populated areas.

However, Starlink has encountered challenges when it comes to meeting the program’s standards. While Starlink’s satellite-based service offers coverage in remote areas, it has not met the FCC’s definition of high-speed internet, which requires download speeds of at least 100 Mbps and upload speeds of 20 Mbps. Over the years, Starlink has faced issues with declining speeds as more users have subscribed to the service. In fact, in 2022, the FCC rescinded a $900 million grant previously allocated to Starlink for rural broadband deployment, citing the service's failure to meet the necessary performance standards.

Despite these setbacks, Musk continues to advocate for Starlink as a solution to the rural broadband gap, arguing that fiber optic broadband is an inefficient and outdated approach. His criticism of the BEAD Program has been vocal, calling it an "outrageous waste of taxpayer money." Musk’s stance has found support among some conservative figures, including Trump, who has expressed approval of satellite internet, suggesting that it is a more efficient solution compared to the extensive costs associated with fiber optic infrastructure. Furthermore, Trump’s allies in Congress, such as Senator Ted Cruz, have voiced concerns about the efficiency of the BEAD Program, which they argue is biased toward fiber optic technology.

As Musk’s influence over government policy grows, the potential conflict of interest becomes more apparent. Musk has an obvious financial interest in the success of Starlink, a company that could see significant benefits if fiber optic broadband funding is reduced or reallocated to satellite internet providers. While proponents of fiber optic broadband argue that it remains the most reliable and scalable solution for high-speed internet access, Musk’s growing influence could lead to significant changes in the way rural broadband is funded and distributed in the U.S.

The Power of Delay: How Musk Could Benefit from a Pause in BEAD Funding

One of the more concerning aspects of Musk’s involvement in government efficiency reforms is the potential for delay in the disbursement of BEAD funding. As the FCC and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) continue to distribute grants under the BEAD Program, there is growing concern that Musk’s influence could result in the defunding or delay of fiber optic projects. Such delays could benefit Starlink, as the longer rural communities remain without fiber optic options, the more likely they are to turn to satellite internet services like Starlink.

In fact, any delay or pause in funding for the BEAD Program could directly increase Starlink’s market share. As communities in rural America remain without high-speed internet, many would be left with few options but to subscribe to Starlink’s satellite service, which currently fills the broadband void in many remote areas. This lack of competition, combined with the absence of better alternatives, creates a powerful business advantage for Musk’s company.

While some legal experts suggest that a delay in BEAD funding could tie the program in legal battles, Musk’s position on government efficiency might lead to strategic delays that benefit Starlink in the long term. Even though companies like AT&T and Verizon argue that fiber optic broadband is the superior solution for rural America, Musk’s influence could steer government policy in a direction that favors satellite technology over more traditional approaches.

The Role of Political Support in Musk’s Broadband Strategy

Musk’s alignment with Trump and his political supporters has become an increasingly important factor in shaping the direction of broadband policy. Trump’s endorsement of Starlink as a solution to rural broadband gaps has led to increased visibility and political support for Musk’s vision. This has allowed Musk to leverage his influence both within the U.S. government and in the broader public discourse.

Notably, Brendan Carr, the newly appointed FCC chair under a potential Trump administration, has echoed Musk’s stance, suggesting that satellite internet providers like Starlink could be better positioned to serve rural areas than fiber optic providers. Carr’s position aligns with Musk’s belief that satellite broadband, despite its current technical limitations, is a viable and potentially more cost-effective alternative to fiber optic cables in low-density areas.

Furthermore, political figures like Senator Cruz and Senator Joni Ernst are increasingly advocating for changes to the BEAD Program, criticizing what they view as inefficiency and waste. By aligning himself with these voices, Musk could further amplify his influence over the future of broadband infrastructure in the U.S., creating a political and business synergy that could result in favorable conditions for Starlink.

Conclusion: The Intersection of Business Interests and Government Efficiency

As Elon Musk takes on a more prominent role in shaping U.S. government efficiency reforms, the potential for conflicts of interest surrounding the BEAD Program and rural broadband expansion cannot be ignored. Musk’s efforts to reduce government spending and streamline federal programs could lead to shifts in funding priorities, potentially disadvantaging fiber optic broadband providers in favor of satellite internet services like Starlink.

While some argue that satellite internet has a role to play in rural broadband solutions, it is essential to recognize that fiber optic technology remains the gold standard for speed, reliability, and scalability. Musk’s influence could lead to a redefinition of what constitutes effective broadband in rural areas, a move that could benefit his business interests while leaving some communities with subpar service.

Ultimately, the balance between government efficiency, technological innovation, and the public interest will be tested as Musk continues to push for changes that could reshape the future of rural broadband in the U.S. The question remains whether these changes will serve the greater public good or primarily benefit Musk’s business empire.

If you enjoy this newsletter, please consider sharing it with your friends and business contacts by clicking the button below. ⬇️ 

Thank you for reading this far. Please share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comment section below.

About The Modern Warfare

We strive to provide insightful and unbiased reporting on the most pressing issues of our time. Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed and ahead of the curve.

Stay informed. Stay vigilant. Stay ahead.

The Modern Warfare Team

Disclaimer: This newsletter is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial or political advice.

That’s it for this episode!

Thank you so much for reading today’s email! Your support is the only way I can write this email for free daily.

Kindly give us feedback in the poll below and share the newsletter with other investors if you find it valuable!