The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), spearheaded by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, has set out to revolutionize federal operations with promises of massive spending cuts and streamlined bureaucracy. However, beneath the surface of these grandiose claims lies a reality of impractical goals and flawed strategies. Dive into this dissection of DOGE's approach, revealing why this high-profile initiative might join the ranks of failed government reform efforts, and what true efficiency in public administration could look like.

If you enjoy this newsletter, please consider sharing it with your friends and business contacts. Click the button below:

Paying the bills

Our newsletter is powered by beehiiv, which partners with trustworthy and high-quality advertisers.

Billionaires wanted it, but 66,930 everyday investors got it first.

When incredibly valuable assets come up for sale, it's typically the wealthiest people that end up taking home an amazing investment. But not always…

One platform is taking on the billionaires at their own game, buying up and securitizing some of the most prized blue-chip artworks for its investors.

It's called Masterworks. Their nearly $1 billion collection includes works by greats like Banksy, Picasso, and Basquiat. When Masterworks sells a painting – like the 23 it's already sold – investors reap their portion of the net proceeds.

In just the last few years, Masterworks investors have realized net annualized returns like +17.6%, +17.8%, and +21.5% (from 3 illustrative sales held longer than one year).

Now, you can skip the waitlist with OUR EXCLUSIVE LINK.

Past performance not indicative of future returns. Investing Involves Risk. See Important Disclosures at masterworks.com/cd.

Today’s partners

Links We Like

A Futile Experiment: Why DOGE is Destined to Miss Its Mark

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a newly formed advisory body led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, promises to streamline federal operations by cutting regulations and slashing wasteful expenditures. However, a closer examination reveals systemic flaws in its goals, approach, and leadership, making meaningful success improbable. Like many similar efforts before it, DOGE is poised to be another ill-fated initiative that stumbles under the weight of its own misguided ambition.

The Ambitious Mandate: A Target Doomed to Fail

DOGE’s initial pledge to cut $2 trillion from federal spending was an overreach from the outset, amounting to nearly one-third of all projected expenditures for 2025. A subsequent reduction of this target to $500 billion demonstrates the unrealistic nature of its ambitions. Even this scaled-back figure is unlikely to be achieved due to the structural composition of federal spending.

Approximately 74% of federal expenditures are locked into defense, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and interest payments on the national debt—areas that are politically sensitive and legally protected. Of the remaining 26%, which funds discretionary programs, much of it is essential, including veterans’ health care, air traffic control, and judicial operations. This leaves DOGE with few viable options to achieve its desired savings.

A Misguided Focus: The Wrong Targets

DOGE’s strategy of targeting progressive organizations and smaller agencies for defunding, such as Planned Parenthood, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and international aid programs, reflects a politically driven rather than efficiency-oriented agenda. While these cuts may appeal to certain ideological groups, their combined savings fall far short of the $500 billion goal. For example:

• Planned Parenthood and other similar groups: $300 million annually

• Corporation for Public Broadcasting: $535 million annually

• Various international organizations: $1.5 billion annually

Even larger potential targets, such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ($6.6 billion) and the Department of Education ($29 billion), make only a modest dent in the $500 billion objective. Meanwhile, agencies like NASA, with close ties to Musk’s SpaceX, are conspicuously spared from scrutiny, raising concerns about crony capitalism and conflicts of interest.

Historical Precedents: A Pattern of Failure

DOGE’s approach is not novel. It mirrors the structure of previous commissions that sought to enhance government efficiency but achieved little. The Grace Commission under President Ronald Reagan, for instance, produced a lengthy list of recommendations to eliminate inefficiencies, yet very few were implemented. Similarly, the Hoover Commission under President Harry Truman failed to deliver on its promises of transformative reform.

These initiatives faltered because they relied heavily on private-sector leaders who lacked a nuanced understanding of government operations. Instead of fostering collaboration with public-sector employees, they generated unfeasible proposals that languished in legislative and bureaucratic gridlock.

Musk and Ramaswamy: The Wrong Leaders for the Job

Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, prominent figures in the private sector, bring business-world tactics to the table—an approach that has historically proven inadequate for navigating the complexities of government. Effective public-sector reforms require deep institutional knowledge and collaboration with career civil servants, who are best positioned to design and implement meaningful changes.

By contrast, Musk’s preference for “moving fast and breaking things” may yield temporary attention-grabbing headlines, but it is fundamentally incompatible with the deliberate and methodical processes required in government. Ramaswamy’s history as a businessman and political donor further underscores the risks of prioritizing corporate interests over public welfare.

The Path to True Efficiency: Learning from Success

While most government reform initiatives fail, those that succeed share common traits. Vice President Al Gore’s National Partnership for Reinventing Government in the 1990s offers a blueprint for achieving meaningful change. This initiative focused on embedding performance metrics into standard government procedures and fostered collaboration between reformers and public employees. Its success demonstrates the importance of measurable outcomes and institutional buy-in.

To genuinely improve efficiency, DOGE must shift its priorities from headline-grabbing cost-cutting measures to implementing modern tools and processes that enhance agency performance. Key strategies include:

1. Outcome-Based Procurement: Focusing on achieving measurable results rather than cutting costs alone.

2. Modern Talent Management: Introducing rotational programs that bring private-sector expertise into government while respecting the distinct nature of public service.

3. Agile IT Management: Emphasizing flexibility and adaptability in technology adoption.

4. Data Transparency: Providing clear and accessible performance metrics to ensure accountability.

5. Citizen Engagement: Involving the public in shaping policies and evaluating outcomes.

The Digital Deficit: A Critical Hurdle

A significant barrier to reform lies in the federal government’s outdated technological infrastructure. Agencies like the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) struggle to adopt modern digital tools, hampering their ability to close the $1 trillion annual tax gap. Without adequate funding for technological upgrades, the government cannot achieve the efficiencies promised by DOGE or similar initiatives.

Investing in digitization and performance measurement systems is essential for long-term improvement. These tools enable agencies to identify inefficiencies, streamline operations, and deliver better services to citizens. However, achieving these goals requires a commitment to sustained funding and collaboration—not sweeping cuts or flashy proclamations.

Conclusion: Rethinking Reform

Efficiency Through Collaboration, Not Cronyism

The Department of Government Efficiency’s ambitious goals are undermined by its flawed design, leadership, and focus. By prioritizing politically motivated cuts and disregarding the importance of institutional knowledge and collaboration, DOGE is destined to fail. The path to meaningful government reform lies not in slashing budgets indiscriminately but in empowering agencies with modern tools, measurable outcomes, and a commitment to public service.

Government efficiency cannot be achieved through quick fixes or unilateral decision-making. True reform requires a balanced approach that combines private-sector innovation with public-sector expertise, fostering a culture of accountability and continuous improvement. If DOGE is to succeed where others have failed, it must embrace these principles and prioritize long-term solutions over short-term gains. Only then can it fulfill its promise of delivering a government that works better for all.

If you enjoy this newsletter, please consider sharing it with your friends and business contacts by clicking the button below. ⬇️ 

Thank you for reading this far. Please share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comment section below.

About The Modern Warfare

We strive to provide insightful and unbiased reporting on the most pressing issues of our time. Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed and ahead of the curve.

Stay informed. Stay vigilant. Stay ahead.

The Modern Warfare Team

Disclaimer: This newsletter is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial or political advice.

That’s it for this episode!

Thank you so much for reading today’s email! Your support is the only way I can write this email for free daily.

Kindly give us feedback in the poll below and share the newsletter with other investors if you find it valuable!